PDA

View Full Version : Rule conflict?



DerbyN8-128
05-08-2011, 08:29 PM
Suspension and Rear - Shocks 1 a iii says -
absolutely no..."NO"...alterations may be made to the stock mounts, mounting locations and the shocks themselves.

However

6. Camber Requirements B says
Cars with struts are permitted to ream out hole to obtain more camber.

Wouldn't reaming out the holes to obtain camber also be considered an alterations to the mounting location of the shocks?

I'm reading through all the rules, having been away from the series for a year I must say the rule changes I see are great. Two thumbs up to everyone involved in getting these in to affect. Lots of very good safety changes in there. :applause:

CJfilms
05-09-2011, 09:58 AM
Right you are Nate.....consider it a bit of an "exception" for cars with struts. Obviously if a car that doesn't have struts has relocated and/or reamed out the mounting holes, that would be considered an illegal alteration.

Now, the question is "how many enduros (Small Cars) have struts?" .........

Philter39
05-09-2011, 09:37 PM
The Mummers have struts.